Skip to main content
OpenSchoolData

Do School Ratings Actually Matter?

Published March 20, 2026 · Analysis

School ratings drive real-estate decisions worth trillions of dollars, influence where families move, and shape property tax revenue that in turn funds schools. But how accurate are they? And do they measure what actually matters for your child?

The Real-Estate Effect

Research from the National Bureau of Economic Research shows that school ratings directly influence home prices. A one-point increase on a 10-point scale is associated with a 1.5-3% increase in home value, which in many markets means $10,000-30,000. This creates a self-reinforcing cycle: higher home prices generate more property tax revenue, which funds better-resourced schools, which get higher ratings.

This is why looking at actual student outcomes rather than just school spending matters. Proficiency rates and graduation data can identify high-performing schools in overlooked communities, schools like those in our top Title I schools list.

What Ratings Get Right

  • Academic outcomes are measurable, proficiency rates, graduation rates, and growth trends are real, comparable data points
  • Transparency helps parents, before rating systems, school quality was opaque to anyone who didn't already know the right people
  • Accountability pressure, low ratings create public pressure for improvement, which has driven reforms at underperforming schools

What Ratings Get Wrong

  • Conflating demographics with quality, some rating systems effectively rate the wealth of a school's neighborhood rather than the school itself
  • Ignoring growth, a school at 45% proficiency that improved from 25% three years ago is making remarkable progress, but a static score makes it look bad
  • Missing intangibles, school culture, teacher quality, extracurricular opportunities, and how a school handles struggling students cannot be captured in a single number
  • Single number oversimplification, reducing a complex institution to a letter grade or number inevitably loses nuance

How OpenSchoolData Approaches Data Differently

Rather than creating a proprietary score, OpenSchoolData presents real federal data transparently. We show NCES enrollment and demographics alongside EDFacts proficiency rates and graduation data, so parents can see what the numbers actually say without a rating system interpreting them. This approach lets parents weigh the factors that matter most to their family.

Read our full methodology for details on our data sources and approach.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, significantly. Research shows that homes in areas with highly-rated schools sell for 6-10% more than comparable homes in lower-rated school zones. A one-point increase in GreatSchools ratings has been associated with a 1.5-3% increase in home value. This creates a feedback loop where wealthy areas fund better schools through property taxes.

Most major rating systems (GreatSchools, Niche, US News) use legitimate data from NCES and state assessments. The methodologies differ, some weight demographics, some focus purely on outcomes. No rating captures everything. OpenSchoolData presents the raw federal data, enrollment, proficiency rates, graduation rates, so parents can evaluate schools directly.

No. Ratings should be one input among many. Visit the school, talk to current parents, observe the classroom environment, and consider your child's specific needs. A school rated B that is the right fit for your child is better than an A-rated school that isn't.

Last updated:

Real federal data: NCES CCD enrollment (2022), EDFacts proficiency rates (2020, district-level), EDFacts graduation rates (2019, district-level).